<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdSense Recently Interpreted as Malware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dotcomreport.com/adsense/google-adsense-recently-interpreted-as-malware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dotcomreport.com/adsense/google-adsense-recently-interpreted-as-malware/</link>
	<description>Online Success Secrets &#38; Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TechChunks</title>
		<link>http://dotcomreport.com/adsense/google-adsense-recently-interpreted-as-malware/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>TechChunks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotcomreport.com/?p=2631#comment-425</guid>
		<description>You can read more about this here - http://techchunks.com/technology/kaspersky-update-false-positive-identifies-google-adsense-as-trojan :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read more about this here &#8211; <a href="http://techchunks.com/technology/kaspersky-update-false-positive-identifies-google-adsense-as-trojan">http://techchunks.com/technology/kaspersky-update-false-positive-identifies-google-adsense-as-trojan</a> <img src='http://dotcomreport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShoeLace</title>
		<link>http://dotcomreport.com/adsense/google-adsense-recently-interpreted-as-malware/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>ShoeLace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotcomreport.com/?p=2631#comment-424</guid>
		<description>I went without a virus scanner for years as I didn&#039;t like to give away extra resources, and also I tend to format and reinstall my OS every few months. For the last few months however I&#039;ve had one, used to use AVG for a while but moved to Avast and I&#039;m pretty happy with it. It&#039;s good if you&#039;ve got other people on your computer, or just to ease your mind a little if you think a file you wanted to download might be a bit suspicious. These days computer have plenty of extra umph to handle a virus scanner without impacting on the overall performance significantly. That is, so long as you don&#039;t use something like Norton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went without a virus scanner for years as I didn&#8217;t like to give away extra resources, and also I tend to format and reinstall my OS every few months. For the last few months however I&#8217;ve had one, used to use AVG for a while but moved to Avast and I&#8217;m pretty happy with it. It&#8217;s good if you&#8217;ve got other people on your computer, or just to ease your mind a little if you think a file you wanted to download might be a bit suspicious. These days computer have plenty of extra umph to handle a virus scanner without impacting on the overall performance significantly. That is, so long as you don&#8217;t use something like Norton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
