Apple Doesn’t Own A Single iPad Related Domain Name

New Updates

Expired Domain Name Game Requires Thorough Research

Expired domain names are Web addresses that don't get renewed when the domain registration term comes to an end. After a brief waiting period, expired domain names are made available to the public for purchase. The demand for expired Web addresses has created a big business in itself. When you pu.... More »

Flipping Domains Goes Local

Domain name flipping is the method that is used for the buying and selling of domain names. The process is so easy that just about anyone can do it. Most flippers opt for a third party listing website, but you can easily maximize your profits by convincing someone to buy, but how?Convincing someone .... More »

Top 5 Things You Should and Shouldn't Do for SEO

SEO (Search Engine Optimization) has been one of the best ways to implement into your websites and blogs to gain more traffic to your search. Gaining a higher ranking on the search engines’ results list takes bringing on great content. Content is king and it’s important to write using relevant k.... More »

Back On The Domain Auction Block: Sex.com

There’s another strange twist in the history of Sex.com. It’s been stolen and returned and then sold and now it’s gone in to foreclosure. If it’s popular subject matter didn’t make this name interesting, surely the history and ongoing story behind Sex.com makes it one of the most pop.... More »

How To Defend Your Domain Name Registration

If you've ever registered a domain name, you presumably chose your business name, your family name, or something equally important. Now that the domain name is yours, the last thing you want is to lose it to someone else. You would likely be amazed to learn it happens nearly every day, to individual.... More »

Perhaps Apple was just being extremely careful not to draw any attention to the widely speculated name of its new multimedia device prior to this morning’s announcement, but one simply cannot overlook the fact that the company doesn’t have ownership over any domain names related to ‘iPad’.

For now, that is.

Apple does not own iPad.com, as you may have noticed. Others have, in any case, and some even suggest that the person who registered the domain name (one Martine Bejasa) sell it to the Cupertino company to become an instant millionaire. Unlikely to happen, IMHO.

But what else doesn’t Apple own? Well, they don’t have control over even a single domain name that has iPad followed by a country or generic TLD. Out of Cupertino’s hands, at least for the time being: iPad.net, iPad.biz, iPad.info, iPad.fr, iPad.de, iPad.es, iPad.eu, iPad.se, iPad.cn, iPad.be and iPad.jp. To name but a few.

They also don’t own iBook.com, iBooks.com or iBookstore.com or anything like that, in case you were wondering.

It’s not that Apple doesn’t care about domain names. It paid heavily for iPhone.com back in 2007, and it owns iPod.com, iMac.com, iWork.com, iTunes.com etc. (but not MacBook.com, curiously). Run a search on UDRPsearch and you will find that Apple regularly fights to (re)gain control over relevant domain names that carry one of their trademarks ¿ which it doesn’t have for ‘iPad’ (yet), just to be clear.

Just a couple of weeks ago, Apple moved to seize 16 domain names from a single individual. There’s no doubt in my mind that they’re going to be aggressively targeting the owners of the domain names listed above, once they secure or license use of the ‘iPad’ trademark.

Update: just to be clear, I’m aware that getting the iPad trademark does not guarantee that Apple will be able to take away the domain names from their current owners. But they’ll most certainly try and succeed with some, depending on what the owners do with the domain name. I’d also like to point out domain names like AppleiPad.com, AppleiPad.net, AppleiPad.info and so on are also not in Apple’s possession at this point

Robin Wauters

ProBlog says:

January 29, 2010 at 7:23 pm

n certain circumstances bad-faith registration of a domain before the trademark is registered — in combination with the other UDRP tests — can result in a finding for the complainant (Apple).

In this case, though, with a registration in 1997, the generic nature of the word “ipad”, and the seeming lack of bad faith (i.e. ipad.com isn’t just an ad-farm), it seems like a hard case for Apple to arbitrate.