INSTANT ACCESSfree SEO report

Google’s Brilliant Move: Not Buying NexusOne.com Domain Name

New Updates

Dynadot Offers VeriSign’s Expired Domain Data Treasure Trove

Last year VeriSign quietly started offering its Internet Profile Service (IPS) to domain name registrars. The service provides traffic data on pending delete domain names. Since VeriSign runs the DNS for .net and .com, it has access to data that most other sources don’t have. Now domain na.... More »

Smaller Retailers Risk Losing Sales With Unmemorable Domain Names

Many small firms may be held back due to poor web address choices, according to research by Streamline.net. The study of 1,300 people found that one in five Britons who use small business websites regularly struggle with domain names that are convoluted or difficult to recall, and younger a.... More »

Apple Doesn't Own A Single iPad Related Domain Name

Perhaps Apple was just being extremely careful not to draw any attention to the widely speculated name of its new multimedia device prior to this morning's announcement, but one simply cannot overlook the fact that the company doesn't have ownership over any domain names related to 'iPad'. F.... More »

AdSense For Domains Expands Use Of Keyword Hints

You asked for it, you got it! AdSense for Domains, which launched a year ago to help publishers earn revenue through ads placed on undeveloped domains, now uses optional keyword hints more often. These keywords are suggestions supplied to Google by domain owners about the types of content users.... More »

Affects Of Age On The Value Of Expired Domain Names

Establishing the true commercial value of an aged domain is quite difficult and tiresome. Domain traders make it a point to snatch aged domains from auction houses just to taste their hidden powers and commercial advantages. However, knowledgeable and experienced domain traders always doubt the comm.... More »

Over the past few days I’ve read numerous stories by my peers suggesting that Google messed up by not registering the NexusOne.com domain name prior to launching its new phone initiative. My initial reaction was the same. But I quickly changed my mind: not acquiring the domain name was actually a smart move. Brilliant

Let’s think about the company we’re discussing. It’s Google. What does Google hate more than anything else? Direct navigation and direct search. It hates that people type domain names directly into the URL bar rather than going to Google first to search for it.

By not using NexusOne.com for its phone domain name, Google has just taught web surfers a lesson about direct navigation not always working. And what happens when someone types in NexusOne.com and sees this?

nexusone-com

Odds are the next thing they’ll do is go to Google to search for “Nexus One”. There they will find one ad, a Google ad for the phone, along with the first search result: Google’s official web page for Nexus One.


It’s not like Google is going to lose sales over this. People interested in the phone will still find it.

Now, normally I’d say the company is inconveniencing its customers, like I did when Dell didn’t buy “Adamo” prior to launching its new line of computers. This is different, since the inconvenience sends customers to Google’s flagship web site to find what they are looking for.

But wait, couldn’t the current owner of NexusOne.com put up ads for phones? Google could sue for trademark infringement. And if a competitor buys the domain Google can quickly pick up the domain name in UDRP since the registration date would be considered after Google got its common law trademark.

So I’m going to respectfully disagree with my peers on this one. By not registering NexusOne.com, Google didn’t make a huge mistake. It was a brilliant move.

Domain Name Wire

By: dotCOMreport Editor
0 Comments 26 views |

About

dotCOMreport Editor is our Chief Editorial department here at dotCOMreport most of our articles come through this department prior to being published here on the dotCOMreport.

Leave a Reply

Contact Us

Member Login

Lost your password?

0 Comments 26 Views